Turns out it has some very human biases.
In his testing, Fraser prompted ChatGPT to pick a random number between 1 and 100, and collected 2,000 separate responses. Look at the graph of the distribution of the returned numbers, and it's immediately clear that there are some outliers.Indeed, the number 42 is astoundingly overrepresented, comprising around a whopping ten percent of all 2,000 responses.
Simply put, 42 is a meme number online much in the same way that 69 is, which demonstrates that ChatGPT is not, in fact, serving as a random number generator and is instead simply reflecting popular numbers chosen by humans in its vast dataset gleaned from the web — although that decidedly tired sex number is strangely underrepresented here, not even passing the one percent mark, suggesting that it may have been manually suppressed..
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Is ChatGPT Closer to a Human Librarian Than It Is to Google?A search engine researcher explains the promise and peril of letting ChatGPT and its cousins search the web for you.
Weiterlesen »
Chatbot ChatGPT, AI won't take white-collar jobs soonInsider tells the global tech, finance, markets, media, healthcare, and strategy stories you want to know.
Weiterlesen »
Sam Altman 'a little bit scared' of ChatGPT, will eliminate 'many' jobsInsider tells the global tech, finance, markets, media, healthcare, and strategy stories you want to know.
Weiterlesen »
Can I be fired for using ChatGPT?Greg Giangrande discusses using ChatGPT to do your work for you and addresses a post from last week.
Weiterlesen »
How to write better ChatGPT prompts, according to AI engineerInsider tells the global tech, finance, markets, media, healthcare, and strategy stories you want to know.
Weiterlesen »