Negative funding rates in PEPE's perpetual futures market suggest a lack of conviction in the meme token's meteoric price rally. reports godbole17
PEPE, the self-proclaimed"most memeable memecoin," has skyrocketed to more than $500 million in market capitalization in just over two weeks since launch.
A negative funding rate indicates that shorts are dominant and are willing to pay longs to keep their bearish bets open. In other words, most traders expect prices to drop. A positive funding rate suggests the opposite.
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Shiba Inu Positions Swapped into Pepe (PEPE), David Gokhshtein Highlights Mysterious ShiftShiba Inu vs. Pepe (PEPE): David Gokhshtein surprised at mysterious shift $SHIB SHIB $PEPE PEPE
Weiterlesen »
Pepe (PEPE) Trading Goes Live on BitMEXThe controversial meme-inspired cryptocurrency, Pepe (PEPE), has been listed on BitMEX, allowing users to trade against USD and USDT with up to 50x leverage
Weiterlesen »
Shiba Inu (SHIB) Rival Pepe (PEPE) Now Available on BitMEXThe controversial meme-inspired cryptocurrency, Pepe (PEPE), has been listed on BitMEX, allowing users to trade against USD and USDT with up to 50x leverage
Weiterlesen »
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Research Integrity and Peer ReviewBackground Differential participation and success in grant applications may contribute to women’s lesser representation in the sciences. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the question of gender differences in grant award acceptance rates and reapplication award acceptance rates (potential bias in peer review outcomes) and other grant outcomes. Methods The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021232153) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. We searched Academic Search Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science for the timeframe 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2020, and forward and backward citations. Studies were included that reported data, by gender, on any of the following: grant applications or reapplications, awards, award amounts, award acceptance rates, or reapplication award acceptance rates. Studies that duplicated data reported in another study were excluded. Gender differences were investigated by meta-analyses and generalized linear mixed models. Doi plots and LFK indices were used to assess reporting bias. Results The searches identified 199 records, of which 13 were eligible. An additional 42 sources from forward and backward searches were eligible, for a total of 55 sources with data on one or more outcomes. The data from these studies ranged from 1975 to 2020: 49 sources were published papers and six were funders’ reports (the latter were identified by forwards and backwards searches). Twenty-nine studies reported person-level data, 25 reported application-level data, and one study reported both: person-level data were used in analyses. Award acceptance rates were 1% higher for men, which was not significantly different from women (95% CI 3% more for men to 1% more for women, k = 36, n = 303,795 awards and 1,277,442 applications, I2 = 84%). Reapplication award acceptance rates were significantly higher for men (9%, 95% CI 18% to 1%, k = 7, n = 7319 applications and 3324 awards, I2 = 63%
Weiterlesen »
Today’s mortgage rates for May 2, 2023Looking for the most up-to-date mortgage rates to empower your purchasing or refinancing decisions? We’ve got you covered
Weiterlesen »
Ethereum withdrawals flatline as memecoins drive ETH burn rates higherEther withdrawals and deposits are approaching parity as memecoin trading activity drives Ethereum burn rates higher.
Weiterlesen »