In a letter to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, attorney Mark Paoletta says emails between Ginni Thomas and attorney John Eastman about the 2020 election results provide no basis for his client to testify.
In a letter to the committee, attorney Mark Paoletta says emails between Thomas and attorney John Eastman about the 2020 election results provide no basis for his client to testify. Emails from the committee show Thomas communicated with Eastman about unfounded claims the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.
Paoletta said the same goes for text messages between Thomas and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Paoletta claimed there is no evidence Thomas discussed the work of the U.S. Supreme Court, where her husband serves as a justice.Thomas initially said she was eager to clear her name. However, Paoletta said he can recommend his client sit for an interview without more information from the committee.
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Attorney For Ginni Thomas Says There’s No Reason For Her To Speak To Jan. 6 Panel“There is no story to uncover here,” the lawyer wrote to the House select committee investigating the U.S. Capitol riot.
Weiterlesen »
Excerpts From Ginni Thomas’ Emails Attempting To Overturn The 2020 ElectionTo Ginni Thomas: “You are powerful. You are incredible. You can do anything. Believe in yourself and your own abilities. You can rock this, girlie!”
Weiterlesen »
Hillary Clinton rips Clarence Thomas: 'He's been a person of grievance’Hillary Clinton got personal with her disparagement of Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday, sniping that her former law school classmate was always a man of 'resentment, grievance, [and] anger.'
Weiterlesen »
Leo Terrell slams Lori Lightfoot for ‘F Clarence Thomas’ remark: 'She sent a coded message'Civil Rights attorney Leo Terrell responds to Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot’s profane statement toward Justice Clarence Thomas following abortion ruling.
Weiterlesen »
Despite headlines, Clarence Thomas doesn’t threaten contraception or homosexualityChill out, people. Despite media (mis)reporting to the contrary, neither a Supreme Court majority nor Justice Clarence Thomas individually comes close to wanting, as one headline put it, to “ban contraception [and] homosexuality.”
Weiterlesen »