The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether a Trump era-ban on bump stocks violates federal law.
FILE - In this Oct. 4, 2017, file photo, a device called a "bump stock" is attached to a semi-automatic rifle at the Gun Vault store and shooting range in South Jordan, Utah. The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether a Trump era-ban on bump stocks, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns, violates federal law.
The Supreme Court already is weighing a challenge to another federal law that seeks to keep guns away from people under domestic violence restraining orders, a case that stems from the landmark decision in 2022 in which the six-justice conservative majority expanded gun rights. A shooter must maintain constant forward pressure on the weapon with the non-shooting hand and constant pressure on the trigger with the trigger finger, according to court records.
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Supreme Court to review Trump-era ban on gun ‘bump stocks’Lawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court agrees to review Trump-era 'bump stocks' ban on firearmsKaelan Deese is a Supreme Court reporter for the Washington Examiner covering the latest happenings at the nation's highest court and the legal issues surrounding Second Amendment rights, abortion, and religious liberties. He previously wrote breaking news as a fellow for the Hill during the 2020 election cycle.
Weiterlesen »
Minnesota Supreme Court justices appear skeptical that states can block Trump from 2024 ballotMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack should prevent him from running.
Weiterlesen »
Minnesota Supreme Court skeptical after hearing Donald Trump's ballot status argumentsMinnesota Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Thursday that states have the authority to block former President Donald Trump from the ballot, with some suggesting that Congress is best positioned to decide whether his role in the January 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol should prevent him from running.
Weiterlesen »
Minnesota Supreme Court skeptical of 14th Amendment effort to bar Trump from presidencyKaelan Deese is a Supreme Court reporter for the Washington Examiner covering the latest happenings at the nation's highest court and the legal issues surrounding Second Amendment rights, abortion, and religious liberties. He previously wrote breaking news as a fellow for the Hill during the 2020 election cycle.
Weiterlesen »
Minnesota Supreme Court grapples with Trump’s eligibility to run in 2024The court heard arguments on a constitutional provision that bars people from holding office if they engaged in insurrection.
Weiterlesen »