The Senate Is America’s Most Structurally Racist Institution

Deutschland Nachrichten Nachrichten

The Senate Is America’s Most Structurally Racist Institution
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten,Deutschland Schlagzeilen
  • 📰 NYMag
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 89 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 39%
  • Publisher: 63%

If there's any institution in American life that needs a reckoning, it is the U.S. Senate. jonathanchait writes

Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images In a time when institutions across the country have undergone a searching self-examination, the reckoning has only begun for the most powerful source of institutional racism in American life: the United States Senate.

The Senate is affirmative action for white people. If we had to design political institutions from scratch, nobody — not even Republicans — would be able to defend a system that massively overrepresented whites. And yet, while we are yanking old 30 Rock episodes and holding White Fragility struggle sessions in boardrooms, a massive source of institutionalized racial bias is sitting in plain sight.

The Senate has also evolved a routine supermajority requirement, which the Founders did not contemplate. The Constitution requires a supermajority in a handful of expressly defined circumstances, like treaties and removing a president from office. The filibuster evolved in the 19th century, first requiring unanimous agreement, then was reduced first to two-thirds in 1917, and then three-fifths in 1975.

Podhoretz complains that admitting Puerto and D.C. would “violate democratic norms,” because “the last grants of statehood,” Alaska and Hawaii, did not alter the Senate’s partisan balance. He is implying, without saying outright, that states have always been admitted in Democrat-Republican pairs. The catch in admitting states is that Republicans could filibuster a statehood bill. But Republicans would filibuster any measure, however watered down, that increases Democratic voting power.

It’s true that the filibuster sometimes stops conservative laws. Over the long run, however, liberals enact more changes than conservatives. This is almost definitional. Looking back over the last 20, 50, or 100 years, most major legislative changes have a progressive cast rather than a reactionary one. What makes the case for reform even stronger is that Republicans can already accomplish most of their goals without overcoming a filibuster.

Wir haben diese Nachrichten zusammengefasst, damit Sie sie schnell lesen können. Wenn Sie sich für die Nachrichten interessieren, können Sie den vollständigen Text hier lesen. Weiterlesen:

NYMag /  🏆 111. in US

Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen

Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.

Making Racism HistoryMaking Racism History'History has not typically been written from the perspective of minority people. The ultimate goal is empowerment and advocacy. I want students leaving the class with a deep understanding of the past and ideas to improve equity for the future.'
Weiterlesen »

Making Racism HistoryMaking Racism History'History has not typically been written from the perspective of minority people. The ultimate goal is empowerment and advocacy. I want students leaving the class with a deep understanding of the past and ideas to improve equity for the future.'
Weiterlesen »

Simon Cowell Hurts Back in Accident While Riding Electric BicycleSimon Cowell Hurts Back in Accident While Riding Electric BicycleSimon Cowell fell off his electric bicycle in Malibu on Saturday and is being treated in hospital for a back injury
Weiterlesen »

America’s stockmarkets are flying high. Its companies still aren’tAmerica’s stockmarkets are flying high. Its companies still aren’tThanks to the success of Disney+, Disney's share price jumped by 5%. Never mind that the company lost $4.7bn in the second quarter
Weiterlesen »



Render Time: 2025-04-22 00:06:25