'These are crucially important cases for LGBTQ workers, women workers, and frankly all workers.' The impossibly high stakes of Aimee Stephens's Supreme Court case
Tuesday’s oral arguments may mark “the first time the word ‘transgender’ is spoken during oral arguments in the highest court in the United States.”
“These are crucially important cases for LGBTQ workers, women workers, and frankly all workers,” Sunu Chandy, the legal director at the National Women’s Law Center, told Jezebel. “Employers, whether they’re hiring, firing, promoting people—that’s supposed to happen without sex discrimination. And the question right now is, do LGBTQ workers get those protections too, or not?”Chandy added that the ramifications of these three cases go beyond workplace discrimination protections for LGBT workers.
Employers, whether they’re hiring, firing, promoting people—that’s supposed to happen without sex discrimination. And the question right now is, do LGBTQ workers get those protections too, or not? Stephens, who for years was a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes in Michigan, was fired in 2013 after she wrote to her employer Thomas Rost that she was trans. “I will return to work as my true self, Aimee Australia Stephens, in appropriate business attire,” she wrote. “I hope we can continue my work at R. G. and G. R.
It’s clear that Rost and the ADF are attacking trans rights in particular, and using the standard rightwing,to do so. In its brief, the ADF claimed that “redefining sex discrimination will cause problems in employment law, reduce bodily-privacy protections for everyone, and erode equal opportunities for women and girls, among many other consequences.” Tellingly, a who’s who of anti-trans bigots havein support of Rost, from the Heritage Foundation’s Ryan T.
Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen
Similar News:Sie können auch ähnliche Nachrichten wie diese lesen, die wir aus anderen Nachrichtenquellen gesammelt haben.
Supreme Court clashes over meaning of 'sex' in LGBT discrimination casesAt issue was the meaning of Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act, which forbids discrimination because of 'sex' but does not specifically refer to gender identity or sexual orientation.
Weiterlesen »
Why #RiseUpOct8 Is TrendingTRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS. QUEER RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS. RiseUpOct8
Weiterlesen »
‘Laughed out of interviews': Trans workers discuss job discriminationTrans employees share their job discrimination stories ahead of oral arguments in 3 LGBTQ workplace discrimination cases before the Supreme Court. - NBCOUT
Weiterlesen »
Commentary: We need a queer Batwoman more than ever. Just look at the Supreme CourtThe CW's 'Batwoman,' starring Ruby Rose as the lesbian superhero, arrives as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear three cases regarding LGBTQ discrimination.
Weiterlesen »
Supreme Court wrestles with LGBT employment discrimination and meaning of 'sex'LGBTQ activists, actress Laverne Cox among them, rallied before the Supreme Court as the justices heard cases involving individuals who say they were fired because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Weiterlesen »